Britain First’s ‘dangerous game’

Last weekend I blogged about Britain First’s decision to publicise personal information about a political opponent. The implication was clear – they were enabling their thuggish followers to find her and do what Nazi thugs do. After all – why else would a neoNazi group want to publish details about how to find a person (including even the pub she sometimes drinks in)?

I’m afraid things have moved on since then though. So far as I’m aware she remains physically unharmed as yet although I can’t speak for the psychological impact of this appaling intimidation. There are some genuinely vicious people in the British neoNazi movement. It’s true, of course that Britain First itself is more an exercise in money-making than ideology but the market they chose to exploit and to stir up is very dangerous indeed. The UK’s nationalist far right has always been full of willing boot boys ready to follow their leader into…. well…

image

In this case into attacks on a single, middle-aged woman who happens to have been a bit shouty on the telly!

image

It seems that their courage knows no bounds. The trouble is that people can and do act upon this stuff. Remember the mosque bombings and assaults when the EDL was at its height (before Tommy Robinson snuck off to join Quilliam). It’s no coincidence that attacks on Muslims have increased again since Britain First began stirring things up again. And now that they’re singling out individuals the outcome is predictable.

image

It seems very likely that the only real motivation behind Britain First itself is to sell tatty merchandise, extract pledges from followers and generally make money for Golding et al. But the demographic they appeal to is altogether more serious. These people really do believe in Britain First and they’re naive enough about due process to think that BF could be a serious political or civil player outside of facebook. Naive or not though – they know how to pour petrol through letterboxes.

Jail for Leeds thug who threw can of alcohol over Muslim woman – Top Stories – Yorkshire Evening Post

The more neoNazi groups like Britain First and the EDL are allowed to spread their hatred the more we’ll see this sort of thugishness on UK streets.

Good to see the law taking it seriously though.

image

Muslims and Christmas

Once again the slanderous far right is claiming that Muslims want to ban Christmas. This nonsense gets repeated every year in an attempt to stir up Islamophobia and division. This year, just like last year, it’s proven to be bollocks believed by nobody but the terminally stupid.

But don’t take my word for it. Have a look at this Christmas card from the Muslim Council of Britain.

image

British neoNazis would love to fool you into hating your neighbour. That’s because they think you’re even more stupid than they are. Don’t prove them right. Some atheists like me would like to see Christmas brought back into perspective but Muslims don’t have a problem with it. Why would they – Jesus Christ is an important figure in Islam.

Keep calm, it’s Christmas

UKIP: The ‘respectable’ face of racism

I came across this very interesting tweet today. I love Twitter for its tendency to boil things down to their most succinct, fundamental elements.

image

The screenshot here may be difficult to see so I downloaded the pic itself. I won’t comment further because I think the image of so many endorsments from UK neoNazi & racist groups speaks for itself.

image

Thanks to @NorseFired (who’s well worth following, by the way) for posting this illuminating little gem.

This report linking UKIP with the extreme right English Defence League may be of interest too.
image
image

On justice

We all have our pet peeves – the things that stir us up, that light that ‘fire in the belly’ and get us going. For some it’s about family, for others it’s about a particular belief, mindset or ideology. For me it’s about ‘justice’.
image
That should’ve been an easy enough thing to say, a straightforward word with a straightforward meaning. Unfortunately though, nothing could be further from the truth. That’s because justice itself has so many meanings, so many different interpretations for so many different people.

For some justice is synonymous with vengeance. They follow, to some degree or another, the old ‘eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth’ standard of the bronze age. For them justice is both simplistic and obvious. Theirs is the ‘two wrongs make a right’ approach that most of us grow out of before we leave the schoolyard. That’s not my type of justice.

Others acknowledge the complexity of determining right from wrong in a world that contains so much more grey than simple ‘black and white’. They accept that justice is complex and often difficult to define. I have to admit, that seems like a very good starting place. But then they go and spoil things by demanding that the victims of crime, the very people least likely to be objective, get to determine the most appropriate punishments. They’re the same people whose only real (and particularly unimaginative) contribution to debates about crime is to state….

“You wouldn’t say that if it was your…. (mother, father, son, daughter, home, money etc.)”

And of course, they’re right. I’d most probably want someone’s head on a plate, not because that’d be the right thing to do but because I’m human, I’m emotionally driven (as are we all) and sometimes I can be irrational (as can we all). But I still shouldn’t be able to mete out judgement or take the law into my own hands.
image
The hallmark of a civilised society is that punishment is taken out of the hands of the individual and placed into the hands of the state.

Still others seem happy with the idea of a state controlled judiciary until it comes to the sentencing of offenders. Then their true colours tend to show. Then they become so similair to the ‘let the victims decide’ contingent that it’s hard to tell them apart.

These are the people who, with little or no knowledge of the often complex court proceedings and mitigating factors insist, as though through automatic reflex, that the sentence is too lenient. These are the people who complain loudly and incessantly that the convicted murderer ‘could be out in ten years’ without ever pausing to imagine just what ten years incarceration might be like. They’re the people who prefer emotional vengeance to rational justice and their lack of a sense of proportion shows all too well. They’re not interested in positive intervention to effect positive change. They simply want another person to suffer. In that respect, despite the apparent veneer of social awareness, they’re no more advanced than the ‘eye for an eye’ brigade.
image
Personally I tend to lean toward utilitarianism – the philosophical approach that seeks to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. That doesn’t make me ‘soft’ or ‘naive’, by the way. I absolutely believe that society has both the right and the duty to protect itself. Sometimes that means long sentences – even life and that’s OK by me. But often it means something quite different. Often it means understanding, compassion and education. Often it means rehabilitation. What it most certainly does not mean and cannot, must not mean is the gratuitous inflicting of suffering. Justice must be purposeful and devoid of emotional bias.

However the real purpose of this post is to make one, simple point. Justice does not involve discrimination, retribution or sanction merely because of who a person is. Justice, as determined by the state, must be in response to actions and behaviours. It has nothing to do with prejudicial assumptions about nationality, heritage, skin colour, sexual orientation, poverty, dependency, political affiliation or place of birth.
image
Justice is meted out in response to crime. Discrimination has no place in the justice system except for the fact that those who act upon those prejudices should be prosecuted along with any other criminal.
image
Perhaps some of those unthinking supporters of the British far right, nationalist movement would do well to remember that.

My PC, lefty, liberal crisis

Usually I’m pretty damn opinionated on this blog. It’s where I rant about the stuff that interests me. In posts about politics and social commentary it’s where I usually feel very sure of my words and statements. So this post is a bit of a departure from the norm. Right now I’m confused.

I have long thought of myself as a pacifist. That’s a big part of my heritage and my roots. Ever since I grew out of the testosterone-fuelled aggression of adolescence I’ve abhored violence in favour of reasoned argument and compassion. I’d much rather help you than hurt you.

image

But now as I watch the venomous rise of fascism among the working people of UK – among my people – the working men and women of Britain, I begin to wonder. I’ve tried reasoned argument. Some have understood the damage the far right is doing to society and rejected neoNazis like the EDL, the BNP and Britain First. Many however have not.

From UKIP and the BNP to Britain First & the EDL there is a wave of nationalistic hatred sweeping across my homeland. With it comes the most hate-filled and violent prejudices against anyone the right wingers think of as ‘the other’. For some that means Muslims, for some it means Jews. Some despise all immigrants whilst still others hate only those who aren’t racially ‘pure’ (whatever that means in biological terms).

image

And many of these neoNazis prefer violence to reason. Indeed, some seem to be so poorly educated that they couldn’t follow a good argument if they tried. What do you do with people who understand only violence?

Of course, I remain a pacifist. I’m not about to go out and attack those with whom I disagree (although many of these far right thugs have threatened the same against me over the years). My crisis isn’t about what happens today. It’s about tomorrow or the next day.

What happens if UKIP & the tories get their way & the UK withdraws from Europe? Such a move would destroy at a stroke the human rights protection UK citizens enjoy today. It would be a racists’ paradise.
image
What if people continue to be duped by the discriminatory lies of Britain First? What if the right wing racists who found a veneer of respectability in UKIP actually gain some power?
image
What if the only way to oppose discrimination becomes physical action?

What if, one day the call goes out to man a real, physical barricade in support of my non-white neighbours? Please understand that when I say ‘barricade’ that’s exactly what I mean. I’m talking about defence here, not attack. But where the jackboot marches violence has always followed whichever way we look at it.

image

What if a violent struggle becomes necessary rather than an intellectual one?

What will I do?

What should I do?

Right now I have no idea how to answer those questions and that worries me greatly. I would never have believed myself capable of even considering the use of force as a political tactic. Now I wonder if one day it may become the only effective response to the violent excesses of white supremacist, ‘Christian’ groups like Britain First. Even the fact that I’ve asked myself that question is frightening.

image

Ineffective by design (but not on a school night)

 

EDL Downing Street piss up 140920Today the almost defunct English Defence League, together with assorted factions of fellow fascists descended on Downing Street in huge numbers. Estimates vary as to the exact size of the demonstration piss up with some claiming as few as 15 of these uneducated, bigoted numpties storming the capital. Certainly they haven’t even reached triple figures, in spite of the hype.

Not that it matters very much. Today is Saturday. Even if they were to get through the gates and past the permanent police presence they’re hardly likely to meet any actual politicians.

In summary then Londoners (at least the few Londoners who can be bothered to notice) have been ‘treated’ to an ineffective display of collective weakness by an equally ineffective (and very, very small) bunch of nobodies who lack the foresight even to check what day of the week it is. By the look of things in this picture nobody even noticed apart from the very small number of coppers judged sufficient to contain this massive crowd tiny little band of neoNazis,

Of course it may be that they chose Saturday because many of their demonstrators wouldn’t be able to attend on a weekday school night. If that’s the case I shudder to think how few attendees this fading group of far right has-beens would have ended up with had they waited until Monday! Then again, judging by the level of argument that these people typically employ (and an almost total inability to use the English language) I seriously doubt that any of them attended any school at all beyond the age of about fourteen twelve nine.
image
And these people claim to be part of the superior (some of them even dare to say ‘Master‘) race!
image
 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 279 other followers